[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <530EC7F8.2040503@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:07:04 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, Martin.Runge@...de-schwarz.com,
Andreas.Brief@...de-schwarz.com
Subject: Re: Final: Add 32 bit VDSO time function support
On 02/26/2014 12:54 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 08:34:58PM +0100, Stefani Seibold wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i still wait for ACK's for the 32 bit VDSO time function support. Whats
>>> the next step? Is there a way to apply it to the linux-git or linux-next
>>> in near future?
>>
>> I thought this was already in the tip tree. Didn't the emails saying
>> this happened come by a few days ago? Or was it pulled from there for
>> some reason?
>
> It is in tip. I think that hpa wants people to test it before it goes
> to Linus, and I certainly want to convince myself that there's no
> performance regression.
>
Absolutely. Your help is *greatly* appreciated.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists