[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140227004229.12081.25317@quantum>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:42:29 -0800
From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
To: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@...phandler.com>,
nicolas.ferre@...el.com
Cc: b.brezillon@...rkiz.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, jason@...edaemon.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] clk: at91: propagate rate change on system clks
Quoting Jean-Jacques Hiblot (2014-02-05 00:37:36)
> From: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>
>
> System clks are just gates, and thus do not provide any rate operations.
> Authorize clk rate change to be propagated to system clk parents.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c
> index 8f7c043..a98557b 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c
> @@ -84,7 +84,8 @@ at91_clk_register_system(struct at91_pmc *pmc, const char *name,
> * (see drivers/memory) which would request and enable the ddrck clock.
> * When this is done we will be able to remove CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag.
> */
> - init.flags = CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED;
> + init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_GATE | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT |
Just wanted to do a quick sanity check here. Do you really need
CLK_SET_RATE_GATE? Otherwise these patches look fine.
Regards,
Mike
> + CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED;
>
> sys->id = id;
> sys->hw.init = &init;
> --
> 1.8.5.2
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists