[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <530F04BD.2060403@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:26:21 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
davem@...emloft.net, ffusco@...hat.com, tgraf@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/hash: fix build failure with older binutils
On 02/27/2014 09:47 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Just like for other ISA extension instruction uses we should check
> whether the assembler actually supports them. The fallback here simply
> is to encode an instruction with fixed operands (%eax and %ecx).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
> Cc: Francesco Fusco <ffusco@...hat.com>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...hat.com>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists