linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] Input: pmic8xxx-pwrkey

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <530E8154.9060403@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:05:40 -0800
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
CC:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] Input: pmic8xxx-pwrkey - Migrate to regmap APIs

On 02/26/14 15:59, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:05:54AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Use the regmap APIs for this driver instead of custom pm8xxx
>> APIs. This breaks this driver's dependency on the pm8xxx APIs and
>> allows us to easily port it to other bus protocols in the future.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/input/misc/pmic8xxx-pwrkey.c | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/pmic8xxx-pwrkey.c b/drivers/input/misc/pmic8xxx-pwrkey.c
>> index 0e1a05f95858..cf6125dc3b51 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/misc/pmic8xxx-pwrkey.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/pmic8xxx-pwrkey.c
>> @@ -120,6 +120,10 @@ static int pmic8xxx_pwrkey_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  		return -ENOMEM;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	regmap = dev_get_regmap(pdev->dev.parent, NULL);
>> +	if (!regmap)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
> This looks really weird.  A previous version of patch was included in
> v3.14-rc1 (1e63bd9cc4), which already included a very similar hunk...
>
> Maybe the fact that the hunk isn't identical is why a rebase didn't drop
> it (and instead, now if this gets merged, we'll have unnecessary
> duplication).
>

Ah yeah, sorry about that. This patch should just be ignored. I don't
think it affects anything else in the series?

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/