linux-kernel - [PATCH 21/46] kernel: Mark function as static in sched/deadline.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:24:41 +0530
From:	Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, josh@...htriplett.org
Subject: [PATCH 21/46] kernel: Mark function as static in sched/deadline.c

Mark function as static in kernel/sched/deadline.c because it is not
used outside this file.

This eliminates the following warning in kernel/sched/deadline.c:
kernel/sched/deadline.c:993:21: warning: no previous prototype for ‘pick_next_task_dl’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]

Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 0dd5e09..cd0f58a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ static struct sched_dl_entity *pick_next_dl_entity(struct rq *rq,
 	return rb_entry(left, struct sched_dl_entity, rb_node);
 }
 
-struct task_struct *pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq)
+static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq)
 {
 	struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se;
 	struct task_struct *p;
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/