[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3402bb7c-3dec-403a-9356-65af803e1b0a@AM1EHSMHS017.ehs.local>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:52:17 -0800
From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] ARM: zynq: cpufreq support
Hi Daniel, Michal,
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 03:14PM -0800, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> another iteration of this series. The patches are the same as in v3, but
> the series shrank a bit. I rebased this series on tip/timers/core, hence
> the two patches for the clockevent core fell out, since Thomas already
> applied those.
> Additionally I removed the patch 'clocksource/cadence_ttc: Use only one
> counter'. Thomas brought up some questions regarding that patch which
> need to be investigated. Since it is not required for the rest of this
> series, I just dropped it for now.
>
> Thanks,
> Sören
>
> Soren Brinkmann (4):
> clocksource/cadence_ttc: Call clockevents_update_freq() with IRQs
> enabled
> clocksource/cadence_ttc: Overhaul clocksource frequency adjustment
> arm: zynq: Don't use arm_global_timer with cpufreq
> arm: zynq: Add support for cpufreq
Any comments? I think most of these should be pretty straight forward
and it would be nice to get some ACKs - or tell me what's wrong. :)
'clocksource/cadence_ttc: Overhaul clocksource frequency adjustment'
might deserve a more thorough review.
Thanks,
Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists