[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140227192435.GA27965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:24:35 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/46] kernel: Mark functions as static in sched/fair.c
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 08:03:22AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:58:05PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 05:20:19PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote:
> > > @@ -5266,7 +5266,7 @@ static unsigned long default_scale_smt_power(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> > > return smt_gain;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -unsigned long __weak arch_scale_smt_power(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> > > +static unsigned long arch_scale_smt_power(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> > > {
> > > return default_scale_smt_power(sd, cpu);
> > > }
> >
> > Fuck no; please think before sending.
> >
> > I'm going to ignore all patches from you henceforth.
>
> Did you perhaps check, and notice that there are *zero* uses of this
> function in the kernel? Nothing overrides this weak symbol; it is no
> longer needed. You removed the one and only user in your commit:
I know that; but you don't get to remove interfaces under the guise of a
static checker and without mention of such in the changelog.
You should bloody well know better.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists