linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] mm: introduce vm_ops->map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:34:55 -0800
From:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Ning Qu <quning@...il.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	anton@...ba.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] mm: introduce vm_ops->map_pages()

On 02/27/2014 02:06 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Dave Hansen
> <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Also, the folks with larger base bage sizes probably don't want a
>> FAULT_AROUND_ORDER=4.  That's 1MB of fault-around for ppc64, for example.
> 
> Actually, I'd expect that they won't mind, because there's no real
> extra cost (the costs are indepenent of page size).

The question is really whether or not we ever access the mapping that we
faulted around, though.  If we never access it, then the cost (however
small it was) is a loss.  That's the mechanism that I'd expect causes
Kirill's numbers to go up after they hit their minimum at ~order-4.

> For small mappings the mapping size itself will avoid the
> fault-around, and for big mappings they'll get the reduced page
> faults.

Kirill's git test suite runs did show that it _can_ hurt in some cases.
 Orders 1 to 4 were improvements.  But, Order-5 was even with the
baseline, and orders 7 and 9 got a bit worse:

> Git test suite (make -j60 test)
> FAULT_AROUND_ORDER		Baseline	1		3		4		5		7		9
> 	minor-faults		129,591,823	99,200,751	66,106,718	57,606,410	51,510,808	45,776,813	44,085,515
> 	time, seconds		66.087215026	64.784546905	64.401156567	65.282708668	66.034016829	66.793780811	67.237810413


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/