[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <530FCDD6.3060701@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:44:22 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: sbsiddha@...il.com, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Nate Eldredge <nate@...tsmathematics.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maarten Baert <maarten-baert@...mail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
Pekka Riikonen <priikone@....fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make math_state_restore() save and restore the interrupt
flag
So, picking up this thread which got dropped on the floor...
On 02/01/2014 11:19 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
> index e8368c6..4e5f770 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> * General FPU state handling cleanups
> * Gareth Hughes <gareth@...inux.com>, May 2000
> */
> +#include <linux/bootmem.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/regset.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> @@ -186,6 +187,10 @@ void fpu_init(void)
> if (xstate_size == 0)
> init_thread_xstate();
>
> + if (!current->thread.fpu.state)
> + current->thread.fpu.state =
> + alloc_bootmem_align(xstate_size, __alignof__(struct xsave_struct));
> +
> mxcsr_feature_mask_init();
> xsave_init();
> eager_fpu_init();
So this bit is giving me a bit of a headache, specifically
alloc_bootmem_align() is an __init function and fpu_init() obviously isn't.
I am doubly confused because init_thread_xstate() only sets the xstate
without any XSAVE features, so the memory allocation we get there will
be insufficient later -- in fact, only a few lines further down the
function, when xsave_init() is called.
I'm wondering if we could put this somewhere inside
xstate_enable_boot_cpu() instead, maybe?
I'm assuming the reason you didn't want to in eager_fpu_init_bp()
anymore is because you want the allocation to happen regardless of if
eagerfpu is enabled, correct?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists