[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140228101226.GO21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:12:26 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
davem@...emloft.net, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/14] ARM: Remove use of struct kprobe from generic
probes code
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:38:58AM -0500, David Long wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c b/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
> index 7cd1763..179deac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
> @@ -12,11 +12,9 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> -#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> #include <asm/system_info.h>
How well has this code been tested? This file doesn't even build because
(I suspect) the above change:
arch/arm/kernel/probes.c: In function 'test_alu_write_pc_interworking':
arch/arm/kernel/probes.c:68:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'BUG_ON' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
make[2]: *** [arch/arm/kernel/probes.o] Error 1
This is because linux/kprobes.h includes linux/bug.h, which would provide
the requirements for BUG_ON().
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists