[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53106486.1090300@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:27:18 +0800
From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Benjamin <bcrl@...ck.org>
CC: Kent <kmo@...erainc.com>, Jens <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-aio@...ck.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] aio: make aio_read_events_ring be aware of aio_complete
Commit 5ffac122dbda8(aio: Don't use ctx->tail unnecessarily) uses
ring->tail rather than the ctx->tail, but with this change, we fetch 'tail'
only once at the start, so that we can not be aware of adding event by aio_complete
when reading events. It seems a regression.
So here we fetch the ring->tail in start of the loop each time to make it be
aware of adding event from aio_complete.
Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
---
fs/aio.c | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
index 7eaa631..f5b8551 100644
--- a/fs/aio.c
+++ b/fs/aio.c
@@ -1029,10 +1029,14 @@ static long aio_read_events_ring(struct kioctx *ctx,
struct io_event *ev;
struct page *page;
- avail = (head <= tail ? tail : ctx->nr_events) - head;
+ ring = kmap_atomic(ctx->ring_pages[0]);
+ tail = ring->tail;
+ kunmap_atomic(ring);
+
if (head == tail)
break;
+ avail = (head <= tail ? tail : ctx->nr_events) - head;
avail = min(avail, nr - ret);
avail = min_t(long, avail, AIO_EVENTS_PER_PAGE -
((head + AIO_EVENTS_OFFSET) % AIO_EVENTS_PER_PAGE));
--
1.7.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists