linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] mfd: sec: Add support for S2MPS14

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <1393585526.31997.1.camel@AMDC1943>
Date:	Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:05:26 +0100
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mfd: sec: Add support for S2MPS14

On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 10:49 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Few days ago I sent patches adding support for S2MPS14 device to the
> > sec-core/s2mps11 drivers. These patches were rather large as they covered
> > multiple subsystems so I decided to split everything into smaller, separate
> > patches.
> > 
> > The original patchset (version 3) can be found here:
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/27194/focus=1649217
> > 
> > This patchset is a small subset of the patchset related to the MFD core
> > driver. It adds support for the S2MPS14 device only to the MFD core driver.
> > I already obtained acks from Lee Jones during previous reviews.
> > 
> > The patchset is based on current Linus' tree *with* patch:
> > mfd: sec-core: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference when i2c_new_dummy error
> > (which is already in Lee Jones' MFD tree)
> 
> Can all of these patches be applied as they are?
> 
> Is anything going to break as a result?

Yes, they can be applied as they are. That was the reason behind
splitting everything. Nothing should break, as far as I reviewed this
and tested.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

> 
> > Krzysztof Kozlowski (4):
> >   mfd: sec: Add maximum RTC register for regmap config
> >   mfd: sec: Select different RTC regmaps for devices
> >   mfd: sec: Use consistent S2MPS11 RTC alarm interrupt indexes
> >   mfd: sec: Add support for S2MPS14
> > 
> >  drivers/mfd/sec-core.c              |   57 ++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c               |   97 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h    |    1 +
> >  include/linux/mfd/samsung/irq.h     |   31 ++++++-
> >  include/linux/mfd/samsung/rtc.h     |   57 +++++++++++--
> >  include/linux/mfd/samsung/s2mps14.h |  152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  6 files changed, 378 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/samsung/s2mps14.h
> > 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/