linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: add DMA support for freescale i2c driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201402281303.52962.marex@denx.de>
Date:	Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:03:52 +0100
From:	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To:	Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@...escale.com>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"wsa@...-dreams.de" <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: add DMA support for freescale i2c driver

On Friday, February 28, 2014 at 12:36:01 PM, Yao Yuan wrote:
> Hi Marek,
> 
> > On Friday, February 28, 2014 at 06:19:18 AM, Yao Yuan wrote:
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > > > @@ -213,6 +238,7 @@ static struct imx_i2c_hwdata vf610_i2c_hwdata
> > > > > = {
> > > > > 
> > > > >  	.ndivs			= ARRAY_SIZE(vf610_i2c_clk_div),
> > > > >  	.i2sr_clr_opcode	= I2SR_CLR_OPCODE_W1C,
> > > > >  	.i2cr_ien_opcode	= I2CR_IEN_OPCODE_0,
> > > > > 
> > > > > +	.has_dma_support	= true,
> > > > 
> > > > So why exactly don't we have a DT prop for determining whether the
> > > > controller has DMA support ?
> > > > 
> > > > What about the other controllers, do they not support DMA for some
> > > > specific reason? Please elaborate on that, thank you !
> > > 
> > > Sorry for my fault. I will modify it.
> > 
> > I would prefer if you could explain why other controllers do have DMA
> > disabled even if the hardware does support the DMA operation.
> 
> Well, Because of the I2C in I.MX hardware don't support the DMA operation.
> But here I also think has_dma_support isn't necessary.

OK, got it now. Thanks!

> > > > Also, can the DMA not do full-duplex operation ? What I see here is
> > > > just
> > > > half- duplex operations , one for RX and the other one for TX .
> > > 
> > > Yes, here have two dma channels, one for RX and the other one for TX.
> > > When we request the channel we should determine it for TX or RX.
> > 
> > Sorry, I don't quite understand this. If you have two DMA channels, can
> > you not use them both to do full-duplex SPI transfer ?
> 
> Sorry, There are also hard for me. I don't understand what is full-duplex
> for dma?

Sorry, nevermind. I was confused by this and some SPI patches review. Like 
Lothar (thanks!) pointed out, using only half-duplex operation is OK.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/