linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] blackfin: bf537: fix typo "CONFIG_SND_SOC_ADV80X

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:13:37 +0100
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>
Cc:	bfin <adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	"open list:CAN NETWORK DRIVERS <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, open "
	 "list:NETWORKING DRIVERS <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, open list" 
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blackfin: bf537: fix typo "CONFIG_SND_SOC_ADV80X_MODULE"

Steven,

On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 18:35 +0800, Steven Miao wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
> >> 1) There are many lines that might be converted to IS_ENABLED() in this
> >> file. I'm not sure if and how that should be done.
> Sorry for the late reply. There are many CONFIG_xxx ||
> CONFIG_xxx_MODULE things, we need a cleanup for it under all the
> stamp.c and ezkit.c.

Should I draft a patch to do that? And should that patch include this
patch, or is this patch finally getting pushed (after some testing, that
is)?

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/