[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140228212923.GI14089@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:29:23 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Fix strict alias issue for find_first_bit
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 06:25:51PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
>
> When compiling perf tool code with gcc 4.4.7 I'm getting
> following error:
>
> CC util/session.o
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> util/session.c: In function ‘perf_session_deliver_event’:
> tools/perf/util/include/linux/bitops.h:109: error: dereferencing pointer ‘p’ does break strict-aliasing rules
> tools/perf/util/include/linux/bitops.h:101: error: dereferencing pointer ‘p’ does break strict-aliasing rules
> util/session.c:697: note: initialized from here
> tools/perf/util/include/linux/bitops.h:101: note: initialized from here
> make[1]: *** [util/session.o] Error 1
> make: *** [util/session.o] Error 2
>
> The aliased types here are u64 and unsigned long pointers, which is safe
> for the find_first_bit processing.
>
> This error shows up for me only for gcc 4.4 on 32bit x86, even for
> -Wstrict-aliasing=3, while newer gcc are quiet and scream here for
> -Wstrict-aliasing={2,1}. Looks like newer gcc changed the rules for
> strict alias warnings.
>
> The gcc documentation offers workaround for valid aliasing by using
> __may_alias__ attribute:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.4.0/gcc/Type-Attributes.html
>
> Using this workaround for the find_first_bit function.
Hurm; didn't I suggest using -fno-strict-aliasing just like the kernel
does? Because the C aliasing rules are bonghits heavy?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists