linux-kernel - Re: Trusted kernel patchset for Secure Boot lockdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 Feb 2014 04:52:42 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
To:	"jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>
CC:	"jwboyer@...oraproject.org" <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: Trusted kernel patchset for Secure Boot lockdown

On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 14:03 +1100, James Morris wrote:

> Ok, which tree should take this?  I'm happy to, although most of it is 
> outside security/ .

Security might make the most sense - I don't think any of the additional
restrictions (beyond kexec, and I think we've hashed that argument out
now) are terribly controversial.

-- 
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>