| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5311C58D.3040006@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 11:33:33 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...g0.de>,
Marek Belisko <marek@...delico.com>
CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv4 2/7] mfd: twl4030-madc: Add DT support and convert to
IIO framework
On 26/02/14 20:03, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> This converts twl4030-madc module to use the Industrial IO ADC
> framework and adds device tree support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>
Mostly fine. I've replicated a few things Lee spotted + one logic bug I think
in handling the platform_data, device tree interaction.
> ---
> drivers/mfd/twl4030-madc.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-madc.c b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-madc.c
> index 5458561..37cb3ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-madc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-madc.c
> @@ -47,11 +47,14 @@
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
>
> +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> +
> /*
> * struct twl4030_madc_data - a container for madc info
> * @dev - pointer to device structure for madc
> * @lock - mutex protecting this data structure
> * @requests - Array of request struct corresponding to SW1, SW2 and RT
> + * @use_second_irq - IRQ selection (main or co-processor)
> * @imr - Interrupt mask register of MADC
> * @isr - Interrupt status register of MADC
> */
> @@ -59,10 +62,73 @@ struct twl4030_madc_data {
> struct device *dev;
> struct mutex lock; /* mutex protecting this data structure */
> struct twl4030_madc_request requests[TWL4030_MADC_NUM_METHODS];
> + bool use_second_irq;
> int imr;
> int isr;
> };
>
> +static int twl4030_madc_read(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> + const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
> + int *val, int *val2, long mask)
> +{
> + struct twl4030_madc_data *madc = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> + struct twl4030_madc_request req;
> + int ret;
> +
> + req.method = madc->use_second_irq ? TWL4030_MADC_SW2 : TWL4030_MADC_SW1;
> +
> + req.channels = BIT(chan->channel);
> + req.active = false;
> + req.func_cb = NULL;
> + req.type = TWL4030_MADC_WAIT;
> + req.raw = !(mask == IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED);
> + req.do_avg = (mask == IIO_CHAN_INFO_AVERAGE_RAW);
> +
> + ret = twl4030_madc_conversion(&req);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + *val = req.rbuf[chan->channel];
> +
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct iio_info twl4030_madc_iio_info = {
> + .read_raw = &twl4030_madc_read,
> + .driver_module = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> +#define TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(_channel, _type, _name, _mask) { \
> + .type = _type, \
> + .channel = _channel, \
> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | \
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_AVERAGE_RAW) | \
> + _mask, \
> + .datasheet_name = _name, \
> + .indexed = 1, \
> +}
A small addition to the ABI docs to include the average case
would be good. Obviously it should be there already but it isn't
as far as I can see.
> +
> +static const struct iio_chan_spec twl4030_madc_iio_channels[] = {
> + TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(0, IIO_VOLTAGE, "ADCIN0", 0),
> + TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(1, IIO_TEMP, "ADCIN1",
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED)),
> + TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(2, IIO_VOLTAGE, "ADCIN2", 0),
> + TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(3, IIO_VOLTAGE, "ADCIN3", 0),
> + TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(4, IIO_VOLTAGE, "ADCIN4", 0),
> + TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(5, IIO_VOLTAGE, "ADCIN5", 0),
> + TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(6, IIO_VOLTAGE, "ADCIN6", 0),
> + TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(7, IIO_VOLTAGE, "ADCIN7", 0),
> + TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(8, IIO_VOLTAGE, "ADCIN8", 0),
> + TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(9, IIO_VOLTAGE, "ADCIN9", 0),
> + TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(10, IIO_CURRENT, "ADCIN10",
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED)),
> + TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(11, IIO_VOLTAGE, "ADCIN11", 0),
> + TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(12, IIO_VOLTAGE, "ADCIN12", 0),
> + TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(13, IIO_VOLTAGE, "ADCIN13", 0),
> + TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(14, IIO_VOLTAGE, "ADCIN14", 0),
> + TWL4030_ADC_CHANNEL(15, IIO_VOLTAGE, "ADCIN15", 0),
> +};
> +
> static struct twl4030_madc_data *twl4030_madc;
>
> struct twl4030_prescale_divider_ratios {
> @@ -702,28 +768,51 @@ static int twl4030_madc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct twl4030_madc_data *madc;
> struct twl4030_madc_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> int irq, ret;
> u8 regval;
> + struct iio_dev *iio_dev = NULL;
>
> - if (!pdata) {
> + if (!pdata && !np) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "platform_data not available\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - madc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*madc), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!madc)
> +
> + iio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&pdev->dev,
> + sizeof(struct twl4030_madc_data));
sizeof(*madc)) is shorter and slightly prefered.
> + if (!iio_dev) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed allocating iio device\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> + madc = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> madc->dev = &pdev->dev;
> + madc->use_second_irq = false;
> +
> + iio_dev->name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
> + iio_dev->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> + iio_dev->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + iio_dev->info = &twl4030_madc_iio_info;
> + iio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> + iio_dev->channels = twl4030_madc_iio_channels;
> + iio_dev->num_channels = 16;
Preferred to use ARRAY_SIZE(twl4030_madc_iio_channels);
That's obviously right, whereas with an explicity number I had
to go check :(
>
> /*
> * Phoenix provides 2 interrupt lines. The first one is connected to
> * the OMAP. The other one can be connected to the other processor such
> * as modem. Hence two separate ISR and IMR registers.
> */
> - madc->imr = (pdata->irq_line == 1) ?
> - TWL4030_MADC_IMR1 : TWL4030_MADC_IMR2;
> - madc->isr = (pdata->irq_line == 1) ?
> - TWL4030_MADC_ISR1 : TWL4030_MADC_ISR2;
> + if (pdata && pdata->irq_line != 1)
> + madc->use_second_irq = true;
This logic looks wrong. If pdata is true, but pdata->irq_line = 0
it will read the of data which might not be there.
> + else
> + madc->use_second_irq = of_property_read_bool(np,
> + "ti,system-uses-second-madc-irq");
> +
> + madc->imr = madc->use_second_irq ? TWL4030_MADC_IMR2 :
> + TWL4030_MADC_IMR1;
> + madc->isr = madc->use_second_irq ? TWL4030_MADC_ISR2 :
> + TWL4030_MADC_ISR1;
> +
> ret = twl4030_madc_set_power(madc, 1);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> @@ -768,7 +857,7 @@ static int twl4030_madc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> }
>
> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, madc);
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, iio_dev);
> mutex_init(&madc->lock);
>
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> @@ -780,7 +869,15 @@ static int twl4030_madc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto err_i2c;
> }
> twl4030_madc = madc;
> +
> + ret = iio_device_register(iio_dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "could not register iio device\n");
> + goto err_i2c;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> +
> err_i2c:
> twl4030_madc_set_current_generator(madc, 0, 0);
> err_current_generator:
> @@ -790,20 +887,32 @@ err_current_generator:
>
> static int twl4030_madc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - struct twl4030_madc_data *madc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct iio_dev *iio_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct twl4030_madc_data *madc = iio_priv(iio_dev);
>
> twl4030_madc_set_current_generator(madc, 0, 0);
> twl4030_madc_set_power(madc, 0);
>
> + iio_device_unregister(iio_dev);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static const struct of_device_id twl_madc_of_match[] = {
> + {.compatible = "ti,twl4030-madc", },
> + { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, twl_madc_of_match);
> +#endif
> +
> static struct platform_driver twl4030_madc_driver = {
> .probe = twl4030_madc_probe,
> .remove = twl4030_madc_remove,
> .driver = {
> .name = "twl4030_madc",
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(twl_madc_of_match),
> },
> };
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists