lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 03 Mar 2014 12:53:41 +0100
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
	Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@...sung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar01@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] regulator: s2mps11: Copy supported regulators from
 initconst

Hi,

On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 10:09 +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:01:50AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Add __initconst to 'regulator_desc' array with supported regulators.
> > During probe choose how many and which regulators will be supported
> > according to device ID. Then copy the 'regulator_desc' array to
> > allocated memory so the regulator core can use it.
> 
> Applied, thanks.

Thanks! Unfortunately I wonder now whether it was a good idea to mark
the regulator_desc array as __initconst. I've seen the warning from
kbuild test robot:
--------
>> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0xf0faab): Section mismatch in reference
from the function s2mps11_pmic_probe() to the
variable .init.rodata:s2mps11_regulators
   The function s2mps11_pmic_probe() references
   the variable __initconst s2mps11_regulators.
   This is often because s2mps11_pmic_probe lacks a __initconst
   annotation or the annotation of s2mps11_regulators is wrong.
--------

I have two ideas for fixing this:
1. The s2mps11_pmic_probe() could be marked with __init and 
platform_driver_probe() should be used. Unfortunately this does not work
because the driver is registered and probed a little later after
s2mps11_pmic_init() when I2C bus driver is probed. During that time the
drv->probe() is actually NULL.

2. The s2mps11_pmic_probe() won't be marked as __init and could copy the
regulator_desc (__initconst) array to local static variable. This way if
it would be called twice the mentioned array __initconst won't be
dereferenced. Unfortunately this won't remove the warning.

Any ideas for solving this?

Best regards,
Krzysztof





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ