linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: cpufreq: Mark function as static in cpufreq.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:59:13 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>
Cc:	josh@...htriplett.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: cpufreq: Mark function as static in cpufreq.c

On 27 February 2014 10:55, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> Hi Rashika,
>
> On 26 February 2014 22:08, Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com> wrote:
>> Mark function as static in cpufreq.c because it is not
>> used outside this file.
>>
>> This eliminates the following warning in cpufreq.c:
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:355:9: warning: no previous prototype for 'show_boost' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> Can you please elaborate how this warning is related to
> the non-static definition of this function?

Ping!!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/