linux-kernel - Re: [patch] x86, kmemcheck: Use kstrtoint() instead of sscanf()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 3 Mar 2014 21:07:25 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@....fi>
cc:	Vegard Nossum <vegardno@....uio.no>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, kmemcheck: Use kstrtoint() instead of sscanf()

On Mon, 3 Mar 2014, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> > Kmemcheck should use the preferred interface for parsing command line
> > arguments, kstrto*(), rather than sscanf() itself.  Use it appropriately.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
> 

Thanks!

> Andrew, can you pick this up?
> 

It's already picked up, see 
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/arch-x86-mm-kmemcheck-kmemcheckc-use-kstrtoint-instead-of-sscanf.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/