[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53157A45.4080600@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 23:01:25 -0800
From: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Linux PPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, scottwood@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] perf: provide a common perf_event_nop_0() for
use with .event_idx
On 03/03/2014 09:19 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-27-02 at 21:04:56 UTC, Cody P Schafer wrote:
>> Rather an having every pmu that needs a function that just returns 0 for
>> .event_idx define their own copy, reuse the one in kernel/events/core.c.
>>
>> Rename from perf_swevent_event_idx() because we're no longer using it
>> for just software events. Naming is based on the perf_pmu_nop_*()
>> functions.
>
> You could just use perf_pmu_nop_int() directly.
No, .event_idx needs something that takes a (struct perf_event *),
perf_pmu_nop_int() takes a (struct pmu *).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists