[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20500571.Fgyz0I6ATm@leonp.plris.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 10:54:04 +0200
From: Leon Pollak <leonp@...is.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: What is wrong?
Hello, all.
I am really sorry for the silence - I was on the business trip and
returned today.
I will recheck everything and try. Meanwhile, the news are not good: our
guys say that it appears that the additional sync DOES NOT SOLVE the
issue.
I ask for excuse, but as I did not know the exact processing, I was
mistaken and, probably, used already gc-ted unit for tests.
Sorry, again.
BR
On Tuesday 04 March 2014 00:33:25 Brian Norris wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:13:36PM -0600, Andrew Ruder wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 01:22:08PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > Perhaps Richard or Andrew can comment on whether this patch should
> > > help you. But I think JFFS2 on NAND uses write-buffered support
> > > which can be affected by this bug.
> >
> > Definitely sounds like the same issue and I'm kind of glad to see it
> > crop up in another filesystem.
>
> We haven't confirmed that the *patch* actually affects Leon's problem;
> just that if he runs an additional 'sync' it solves his problem.
> Leon, did you get to try the patch?
>
> Anyway, should commit 807612db2f9940b9fa6deaef054eb16d51bd3e00 be
> marked for -stable?
>
> Brian
--
Leon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists