[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140304094236.GN9987@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:42:36 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>, acme@...stprotocols.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jolsa@...hat.com,
jmario@...hat.com, fowles@...each.com, eranian@...gle.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Richard Fowles <rfowles@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/19] perf c2c: Shared data analyser
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:36:25PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Heh. I never thought about that. And sure enough a quick test with
> > mem-stores commented out produced the same results (minus the stores).
> >
> > One would just have to 'figure' out what cacheline offsets are causing the
> > HITMs.
>
> Often that can be determined statically from the instruction (register-offset)
>
> However keep in mind that there is some skid so the instruction may not
> be correct.
Even with the real_ip pebs field? I thought the whole purpose of that
was to tag the actual instruction matching the event.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists