[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140303174416.2240ec9f@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:44:16 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/6] networking: address root block upon initialization
On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:05:18 -0800
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> <mcgrof@...not-panic.com> wrote:
> > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
>
> <-- snip -->
>
> > As I tested using the root block preference I noticed that if a net_device
> > slave under the bridge gets the designated root port prior to setting in
> > userspace the root_block feature enabling the feature won't kick the
> > bridge to remove that net_device from the designated port. I addressed
> > that issue and also upkeeping the initial random MAC address given to
> > the bridge as if othwerwise we'd end up with a zero MAC address bridge
> > if we root block all ports. I have only done local tests I'd appreciate a
> > bit more wide test coverage and review.
>
>
> Stephen,
>
> I should note that even if we discard patches 4-6 patches for an
> alternative implementation patches 1-3 should still be applicable for
> review. Let me know what you think of those.
>
> Luis
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
I agree with 0-3 as normal improvements.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists