linux-kernel - [PATCH tip] sched/rt: Fix picking RT and DL tasks from empty queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1393946746.3643.3.camel@tkhai>
Date:	Tue, 4 Mar 2014 19:25:46 +0400
From:	Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <tkhai@...dex.ru>
Subject: [PATCH tip] sched/rt: Fix picking RT and DL tasks from empty queue

The problems:

1)We check for rt_nr_running before call of put_prev_task().
If previous task is RT, its rt_rq may become throttled
and dequeued after this call.

In case of p is from rt->rq this just causes picking a task
from throttled queue, but in case of its rt_rq is child
we are guaranteed catch BUG_ON.
    
2)The same with deadline class. The only difference we operate
on only dl_rq.
    
This patch fix all above and it adds a small skip in DL update
like we've already done for RT class:

	if (unlikely((s64)delta_exec <= 0))
		return;

This will optimize sequential update_curr_dl() calls a little.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
CC: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 10 ++++++++--
 kernel/sched/rt.c       |  7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index e4f3ac3..27ef409 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -609,8 +609,8 @@ static void update_curr_dl(struct rq *rq)
 	 * approach need further study.
 	 */
 	delta_exec = rq_clock_task(rq) - curr->se.exec_start;
-	if (unlikely((s64)delta_exec < 0))
-		delta_exec = 0;
+	if (unlikely((s64)delta_exec <= 0))
+		return;
 
 	schedstat_set(curr->se.statistics.exec_max,
 		      max(curr->se.statistics.exec_max, delta_exec));
@@ -1023,6 +1023,12 @@ struct task_struct *pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
 
 	if (need_pull_dl_task(rq, prev))
 		pull_dl_task(rq);
+	/*
+	 * When prev is DL, we may throttle it in put_prev_task().
+	 * So, we update time before we check for dl_nr_running.
+	 */
+	if (prev->sched_class == &dl_sched_class)
+		update_curr_dl(rq);
 
 	if (unlikely(!dl_rq->dl_nr_running))
 		return NULL;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index facc824..f3cee0a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1379,6 +1379,13 @@ pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
 			return RETRY_TASK;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * We may dequeue prev's rt_rq in put_prev_task().
+	 * So, we update time before rt_nr_running check.
+	 */
+	if (prev->sched_class == &rt_sched_class)
+		update_curr_rt(rq);
+
 	if (!rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
 		return NULL;
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/