[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <856c5dedc14a458b8100dcb2d3a2f9e6@DFM-DB3MBX15-06.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:57:00 +0000
From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org"
<driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] hyperv: Move state setting for link query
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Wang [mailto:jasowang@...hat.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 10:10 PM
> To: Haiyang Zhang; davem@...emloft.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: KY Srinivasan; olaf@...fle.de; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; driverdev-
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] hyperv: Move state setting for link query
>
> On 03/04/2014 07:54 AM, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> > It moves the state setting for query into rndis_filter_receive_response().
> > All callbacks including query-complete and status-callback are
> > synchronized by channel->inbound_lock. This prevents pentential race
> between them.
>
> This still looks racy to me. The problem is workqueue is not synchronized with
> those here.
>
> Consider the following case in netvsc_link_change():
>
> if (rdev->link_state) {
> ... receive interrupt ...
> rndis_filter_receice_response() which changes rdev->link_state
> ...
> netif_carrier_off()
> }
>
> And also it need to schedule a work otherwise the link status is out of sync.
The rndis_filter_query_device_link_status() makes the query and wait for the
complete message, including set state, before returning.
The rndis_filter_query_device_link_status() is called from rndis_filter_device_add(),
which is called from either netvsc_change_mtu() or netvsc_probe().
The change_mtu() and netvsc_link_change() are synchronized by rtnl_lock().
In netvsc_probe(), the status query & complete happens before register_netdev(), and
the netvsc_linkstatus_callback() schedules the work only after netdevice is registered.
So, there are no race in either case.
The carrier_on/off work will be scheduled when netvsc_open() is called. Then,
the status will be updated based on the latest link_state.
Thanks,
- Haiyang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists