linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.10 87/97] ARM: 7749/1: spinlock: retry trylock operation if strex fails on free lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue,  4 Mar 2014 12:04:40 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Tony Thompson <anthony.thompson@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 87/97] ARM: 7749/1: spinlock: retry trylock operation if strex fails on free lock

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>

commit 15e7e5c1ebf556cd620c9b091e121091ac760f6d upstream.

An exclusive store instruction may fail for reasons other than lock
contention (e.g. a cache eviction during the critical section) so, in
line with other architectures using similar exclusive instructions
(alpha, mips, powerpc), retry the trylock operation if the lock appears
to be free but the strex reported failure.

Reported-by: Tony Thompson <anthony.thompson@....com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h |   23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -97,19 +97,22 @@ static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_s
 
 static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
 {
-	unsigned long tmp;
+	unsigned long contended, res;
 	u32 slock;
 
-	__asm__ __volatile__(
-"	ldrex	%0, [%2]\n"
-"	subs	%1, %0, %0, ror #16\n"
-"	addeq	%0, %0, %3\n"
-"	strexeq	%1, %0, [%2]"
-	: "=&r" (slock), "=&r" (tmp)
-	: "r" (&lock->slock), "I" (1 << TICKET_SHIFT)
-	: "cc");
+	do {
+		__asm__ __volatile__(
+		"	ldrex	%0, [%3]\n"
+		"	mov	%2, #0\n"
+		"	subs	%1, %0, %0, ror #16\n"
+		"	addeq	%0, %0, %4\n"
+		"	strexeq	%2, %0, [%3]"
+		: "=&r" (slock), "=&r" (contended), "=r" (res)
+		: "r" (&lock->slock), "I" (1 << TICKET_SHIFT)
+		: "cc");
+	} while (res);
 
-	if (tmp == 0) {
+	if (!contended) {
 		smp_mb();
 		return 1;
 	} else {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/