lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140304200348.803488131@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue,  4 Mar 2014 12:04:38 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 85/97] ARM64: unwind: Fix PC calculation

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>

commit e306dfd06fcb44d21c80acb8e5a88d55f3d1cf63 upstream.

The frame PC value in the unwind code used to just take the saved LR
value and use that.  That's incorrect as a stack trace, since it shows
the return path stack, not the call path stack.

In particular, it shows faulty information in case the bl is done as
the very last instruction of one label, since the return point will be
in the next label. That can easily be seen with tail calls to panic(),
which is marked __noreturn and thus doesn't have anything useful after it.

Easiest here is to just correct the unwind code and do a -4, to get the
actual call site for the backtrace instead of the return site.

Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c |    6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -48,7 +48,11 @@ int unwind_frame(struct stackframe *fram
 
 	frame->sp = fp + 0x10;
 	frame->fp = *(unsigned long *)(fp);
-	frame->pc = *(unsigned long *)(fp + 8);
+	/*
+	 * -4 here because we care about the PC at time of bl,
+	 * not where the return will go.
+	 */
+	frame->pc = *(unsigned long *)(fp + 8) - 4;
 
 	return 0;
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ