[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140304200347.868094322@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:04:09 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 56/97] x86: dma-mapping: fix GFP_ATOMIC macro usage
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
commit c091c71ad2218fc50a07b3d1dab85783f3b77efd upstream.
GFP_ATOMIC is not a single gfp flag, but a macro which expands to the other
flags, where meaningful is the LACK of __GFP_WAIT flag. To check if caller
wants to perform an atomic allocation, the code must test for a lack of the
__GFP_WAIT flag. This patch fixes the issue introduced in v3.5-rc1.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
@@ -100,8 +100,10 @@ void *dma_generic_alloc_coherent(struct
flag |= __GFP_ZERO;
again:
page = NULL;
- if (!(flag & GFP_ATOMIC))
+ /* CMA can be used only in the context which permits sleeping */
+ if (flag & __GFP_WAIT)
page = dma_alloc_from_contiguous(dev, count, get_order(size));
+ /* fallback */
if (!page)
page = alloc_pages_node(dev_to_node(dev), flag, get_order(size));
if (!page)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists