[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140304200346.382841545@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:03:21 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 08/97] ARM: dma-mapping: fix GFP_ATOMIC macro usage
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
commit 10c8562f932d89c030083e15f9279971ed637136 upstream.
GFP_ATOMIC is not a single gfp flag, but a macro which expands to the other
flags and LACK of __GFP_WAIT flag. To check if caller wanted to perform an
atomic allocation, the code must test __GFP_WAIT flag presence. This patch
fixes the issue introduced in v3.6-rc5
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -1311,7 +1311,7 @@ static void *arm_iommu_alloc_attrs(struc
*handle = DMA_ERROR_CODE;
size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
- if (gfp & GFP_ATOMIC)
+ if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
return __iommu_alloc_atomic(dev, size, handle);
pages = __iommu_alloc_buffer(dev, size, gfp, attrs);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists