[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53163ADE.8080905@nod.at>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:43:10 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, vgupta@...opsys.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
hskinnemoen@...il.com, egtvedt@...fundet.no, vapier@...too.org,
msalter@...hat.com, a-jacquiot@...com, starvik@...s.com,
jesper.nilsson@...s.com, dhowells@...hat.com, rkuo@...eaurora.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, takata@...ux-m32r.org,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, james.hogan@...tec.com, monstr@...str.eu,
yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
jonas@...thpole.se, jejb@...isc-linux.org, deller@....de,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, liqin.linux@...il.com,
lennox.wu@...il.com, cmetcalf@...era.com, gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
tj@...nel.org, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/44] Add translate_signal() helper
Am 04.03.2014 19:41, schrieb Oleg Nesterov:
> On 03/03, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>
>> +static inline int translate_signal(int sig)
>> +{
>> + struct thread_info *info = current_thread_info();
>> +
>> + if (info->exec_domain
>
> Afaics it can't be NULL.
Good point. Will change.
>> && info->exec_domain->signal_invmap && sig < 32)
>> + return info->exec_domain->signal_invmap[sig];
>> +
>
> And why default_exec_domain has .signal_invmap = ident_map ?
> translate_signal-like code should check ->signal_invmap != NULL
> anyway.
>
> Off topic, but can't we kill exec_domain->signal_map ? it seems that
> it is unused.
>
> Hmm. And who actually uses exec_domain->handler() ?? asm-offsets.c,
> but I do not see any usage of TI_EXEC_DOMAIN.
>
> In short: I agree with this change but I am totally confused. To the
> point, I am not sure I even understand ->signal_invmap. I mean, it
> seems that only arthur_exec_domain has a non-ident map. Why, say,
> x86 does signr_convert() ? and only if CONFIG_X86_32? Is there any
> external module which does register_exec_domain(strange_invmap) ?
I remember a discussion with Al where he noted that register_exec_domain()
is currently only used by out of tree horrors. B-)
I'm sure we can rip it out of most archs. They seem to have it only because
they've copy&pasted it from i386.
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists