linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH] x86: set Pentium M as PAE capable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:17:30 +0700
From:	Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@...il.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>,
	Dennis Mungai <dmngaie@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devzero@....de
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] x86: set Pentium M as PAE capable

On 4 March 2014 17:44, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:06:03PM +0700, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:04:19PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> > forcepae is descriptive.
>>
>> Back to forcepae.
>
> Ok, it looks ok to me after a quick look. Now you only have to ask
> Dave whether he's fine with you merging his patch into yours, write a
> nice commit message explaining why this patch is needed and give it a
> final test on your machine.

Dave - are you ok with the merge?

I take it I am expected to re-post the most recent patch plus
changelog entry as a new thread (and with a subject that better
reflects the new patch)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/