[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403050230120.24331@jringle-ubuntu>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:32:26 -0500 (EST)
From: Jon Ringle <jon@...gle.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
cc: "Ringle, Jonathan" <Jonathan.Ringle@...dpoint.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add option to build with -O3
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:01:49PM -0500, Jon Ringle wrote:
> > +config CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED
> > + bool "Optimze for speed (-O3)"
> > + help
> > + Enabling this option will pass "-O3" to gcc
> > + resulting in a larger kernel (but possibly faster)
>
> Are you sure about that? Have you measured it?
(Resending this message, since it was "destroyed". Hopefully, this is now
an an acceptable form :)
I do know that there is an improvement performance-wise for my particular
use-case.
My target is an ARM board being built with gcc-4.8.2. My board has on it a
sc16is740 that is used as an RS-485 port. The sc16is740 is on the i2c bus,
so when an interrupt comes in to indicate that there is data available to
be read, I need to get the data over the i2c bus. I do this on a kthread
to do this work. The i2c transactions (using i2c-davinci driver) are also
interrupt driven. I was seeing a lot of lost packets when receiving data
at only 19200. Adding the -O3 compile option helped in this regard in that
I am now rarely seeing packet loss.
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists