[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <531722D9.9020904@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 15:12:57 +0200
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: davinci: fix gpio selection for OF
Hi Alexander,
On 03/05/2014 01:21 PM, Alexander Holler wrote:
> The driver missed an of_xlate function to translate gpio numbers
> as found in the DT to the correct chip and number.
>
> While there I've set #gpio_cells to a fixed value of 2.
>
> I've used gpio-pxa.c as template for those changes and tested my changes
> successfully on a da850 board using entries for gpio-leds in a DT. So I didn't
> reinvent the wheel but just copied and tested stuff.
>
> Thanks to Grygorii Strashko for the hint to the existing code in gpio-pxa.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Looks good to me now. Thanks.
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> Changes in v2: replaced static variables by indirections.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> index 7629b4f..92574a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> @@ -172,6 +172,27 @@ of_err:
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
> +static int davinci_gpio_of_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> + const struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec,
> + u32 *flags)
> +{
> + struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips = dev_get_drvdata(gc->dev);
> + struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(gc->dev);
> +
> + if (gpiospec->args[0] > pdata->ngpio)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (gc != &chips[gpiospec->args[0] / 32].chip)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (flags)
> + *flags = gpiospec->args[1];
> +
> + return gpiospec->args[0] % 32;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int i, base;
> @@ -236,6 +257,9 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> chips[i].chip.ngpio = 32;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
> + chips[i].chip.of_gpio_n_cells = 2;
> + chips[i].chip.of_xlate = davinci_gpio_of_xlate;
> + chips[i].chip.dev = dev;
> chips[i].chip.of_node = dev->of_node;
> #endif
> spin_lock_init(&chips[i].lock);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists