[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53167662.5000801@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 08:57:06 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
<containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: missing rcu read lock around task_css_set
On 2014/3/5 3:47, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>> Hrm... there is a PF_EXITING check there already:
>>>
>>> #define task_css_set_check(task, __c) \
>>> rcu_dereference_check((task)->cgroups, \
>>> lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex) || \
>>> lockdep_is_held(&css_set_rwsem) || \
>>> ((task)->flags & PF_EXITING) || (__c))
>>>
>>> I see it's not happening on Linus's master so I'll run a bisection to figure out what broke it.
>>
>> Hi Tejun,
>>
>> It bisects down to your patch: "cgroup: drop task_lock() protection
>> around task->cgroups". I'll look into it later unless it's obvious
>> to you.
>
> Hmmm... maybe I'm confused and PF_EXITING is not set there and
> task_lock was what held off the lockdep warning. Confused....
>
Because this cgroup_exit() is called in a failure path in copy_process().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists