[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca6e88ec74af496383d25d0c29730d4c@DFM-DB3MBX15-06.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 15:06:13 +0000
From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org"
<driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] hyperv: Move state setting for link query
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Wang [mailto:jasowang@...hat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 12:57 AM
> To: Haiyang Zhang; davem@...emloft.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: KY Srinivasan; olaf@...fle.de; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; driverdev-
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] hyperv: Move state setting for link query
>
> On 03/05/2014 12:57 AM, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jason Wang [mailto:jasowang@...hat.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 10:10 PM
> >> To: Haiyang Zhang; davem@...emloft.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> >> Cc: KY Srinivasan; olaf@...fle.de; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> >> driverdev- devel@...uxdriverproject.org
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] hyperv: Move state setting for link
> >> query
> >>
> >> On 03/04/2014 07:54 AM, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> >>> It moves the state setting for query into rndis_filter_receive_response().
> >>> All callbacks including query-complete and status-callback are
> >>> synchronized by channel->inbound_lock. This prevents pentential race
> >> between them.
> >>
> >> This still looks racy to me. The problem is workqueue is not
> >> synchronized with those here.
> >>
> >> Consider the following case in netvsc_link_change():
> >>
> >> if (rdev->link_state) {
> >> ... receive interrupt ...
> >> rndis_filter_receice_response() which changes rdev->link_state
> >> ...
> >> netif_carrier_off()
> >> }
> >>
> >> And also it need to schedule a work otherwise the link status is out of sync.
> > The rndis_filter_query_device_link_status() makes the query and wait
> > for the complete message, including set state, before returning.
> >
> > The rndis_filter_query_device_link_status() is called from
> > rndis_filter_device_add(), which is called from either netvsc_change_mtu()
> or netvsc_probe().
> >
> > The change_mtu() and netvsc_link_change() are synchronized by
> rtnl_lock().
> > In netvsc_probe(), the status query & complete happens before
> > register_netdev(), and the netvsc_linkstatus_callback() schedules the work
> only after netdevice is registered.
> > So, there are no race in either case.
> >
> > The carrier_on/off work will be scheduled when netvsc_open() is
> > called. Then, the status will be updated based on the latest link_state.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > - Haiyang
> >
>
> I see. Then if the link status is changing during mtu changing in guest.
> Looks like we may miss a link status updating?
When changing mtu, rndis_filter_device_add() is called, and host will send a link
status call back immediately after connect-to-netvsp, no matter the link is changing
or not. This will schedule a work to update the status.
Thanks,
- Haiyang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists