[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1394029455-23128-59-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:23:02 +0000
From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.11 058/131] cpufreq: powernow-k8: Initialize per-cpu data-structures properly
3.11.10.6 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit c3274763bfc3bf1ececa269ed6e6c4d7ec1c3e5e upstream.
The powernow-k8 driver maintains a per-cpu data-structure called
powernow_data that is used to perform the frequency transitions.
It initializes this data structure only for the policy->cpu. So,
accesses to this data structure by other CPUs results in various
problems because they would have been uninitialized.
Specifically, if a cpu (!= policy->cpu) invokes the drivers' ->get()
function, it returns 0 as the KHz value, since its per-cpu memory
doesn't point to anything valid. This causes problems during
suspend/resume since cpufreq_update_policy() tries to enforce this
(0 KHz) as the current frequency of the CPU, and this madness gets
propagated to adjust_jiffies() as well. Eventually, lots of things
start breaking down, including the r8169 ethernet card, in one
particularly interesting case reported by Pierre Ossman.
Fix this by initializing the per-cpu data-structures of all the CPUs
in the policy appropriately.
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70311
Reported-by: Pierre Ossman <pierre@...man.eu>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
index c39d189..9292f1f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
@@ -1100,7 +1100,7 @@ static int powernowk8_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *pol)
{
struct powernow_k8_data *data;
struct init_on_cpu init_on_cpu;
- int rc;
+ int rc, cpu;
smp_call_function_single(pol->cpu, check_supported_cpu, &rc, 1);
if (rc)
@@ -1169,7 +1169,9 @@ static int powernowk8_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *pol)
pr_debug("cpu_init done, current fid 0x%x, vid 0x%x\n",
data->currfid, data->currvid);
- per_cpu(powernow_data, pol->cpu) = data;
+ /* Point all the CPUs in this policy to the same data */
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, pol->cpus)
+ per_cpu(powernow_data, cpu) = data;
return 0;
@@ -1184,6 +1186,7 @@ err_out:
static int powernowk8_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *pol)
{
struct powernow_k8_data *data = per_cpu(powernow_data, pol->cpu);
+ int cpu;
if (!data)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1194,7 +1197,8 @@ static int powernowk8_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *pol)
kfree(data->powernow_table);
kfree(data);
- per_cpu(powernow_data, pol->cpu) = NULL;
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, pol->cpus)
+ per_cpu(powernow_data, cpu) = NULL;
return 0;
}
--
1.9.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists