[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1394029455-23128-20-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:22:23 +0000
From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Bjoern C <lkml@...l-home.ch>,
Alexandru DAMIAN <alexandru.damian@...el.com>,
Enrico Tagliavini <enrico.tagliavini@...il.com>,
Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.11 019/131] drm/i915: Prevent MI_DISPLAY_FLIP straddling two cachelines on IVB
3.11.10.6 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ville=20Syrj=C3=A4l=C3=A4?= <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
commit f66fab8e1cd6b3127ba4c5c0d11539fbe1de1e36 upstream.
According to BSpec the entire MI_DISPLAY_FLIP packet must be contained
in a single cacheline. Make sure that happens.
v2: Use intel_ring_begin_cacheline_safe()
v3: Use intel_ring_cacheline_align() (Chris)
Cc: Bjoern C <lkml@...l-home.ch>
Cc: Alexandru DAMIAN <alexandru.damian@...el.com>
Cc: Enrico Tagliavini <enrico.tagliavini@...il.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74053
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
[ luis: backported to 3.11: adjusted context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 0e3f213..5df9798 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -7477,6 +7477,20 @@ static int intel_gen7_queue_flip(struct drm_device *dev,
goto err_unpin;
}
+ /*
+ * BSpec MI_DISPLAY_FLIP for IVB:
+ * "The full packet must be contained within the same cache line."
+ *
+ * Currently the LRI+SRM+MI_DISPLAY_FLIP all fit within the same
+ * cacheline, if we ever start emitting more commands before
+ * the MI_DISPLAY_FLIP we may need to first emit everything else,
+ * then do the cacheline alignment, and finally emit the
+ * MI_DISPLAY_FLIP.
+ */
+ ret = intel_ring_cacheline_align(ring);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_unpin;
+
ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 4);
if (ret)
goto err_unpin;
--
1.9.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists