| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:16:45 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [blk-lib] 6a0608544e5: fileio -77.4% max latency, -5.7%
throughput
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:52:25PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 09:21:30PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > Hi Kent,
> >
> > FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >
> > git://evilpiepirate.org/~kent/linux-bcache.git for-jens
> > commit 6a0608544e5672bd9a044c285119547eae41abe5 ("blk-lib.c: generic_make_request() handles large bios now")
> >
> > test case: snb-drag/sysbench/fileio/600s-100%-1HDD-ext4-64G-1024-seqrewr-sync
snb-drag is the test machine, it's a SNB desktop.
The test command is
mkfs -t ext4 -q /dev/sda2
mount -t ext4 /dev/sda2 /fs/sda2
cd /fs/sda2
for i in $(seq 0 1023)
do
fallocate -l 67108864 test_file.$i
done
sysbench --test=fileio --max-requests=0 --num-threads=4 --max-time=600 --file-test-mode=seqrewr --file-total-size=68719476736 --file-io-mode=sync --file-num=1024 run
> I'm trying to figure out how to parse this and the graphs - where do I find the
> test? And is there anything you can point me to for the graphs, or is that
> output from that test?
>
> >
> > 11541d5f5b7002b 6a0608544e5672bd9a044c285
> > --------------- -------------------------
> > 1885 ~60% -77.4% 426 ~ 7% TOTAL fileio.request_latency_max_ms
The ~XX% numbers are stddev percent.
The [+-]XX% is change percent.
> > 6258 ~ 0% -5.7% 5904 ~ 0% TOTAL fileio.requests_per_sec
> > 26 ~ 1% +702.3% 211 ~ 8% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-4096.num_slabs
> > 217 ~ 1% +682.3% 1697 ~ 8% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-4096.num_objs
> > 26 ~ 1% +702.3% 211 ~ 8% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-4096.active_slabs
> > 211 ~ 2% +701.5% 1697 ~ 8% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-4096.active_objs
> > 2 ~ 0% -50.0% 1 ~ 0% TOTAL vmstat.procs.b
> > 2236 ~ 0% +63.6% 3659 ~ 3% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-256.num_objs
> > 2217 ~ 0% +63.4% 3623 ~ 3% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-256.active_objs
> > 3274 ~ 1% +47.8% 4837 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.nr_slab_unreclaimable
> > 13096 ~ 1% +47.7% 19350 ~ 2% TOTAL meminfo.SUnreclaim
> > 62558204 ~ 5% -30.7% 43379766 ~ 1% TOTAL cpuidle.C3-SNB.time
> > 91031 ~ 4% -29.4% 64253 ~ 2% TOTAL cpuidle.C1E-SNB.usage
> > 34092 ~ 2% -17.6% 28085 ~ 1% TOTAL cpuidle.C3-SNB.usage
> > 2656 ~ 2% -15.0% 2258 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.kswapd_high_wmark_hit_quickly
> > 266339 ~ 2% +14.2% 304129 ~ 0% TOTAL cpuidle.C6-SNB.usage
> > 21899 ~ 2% +9.6% 23992 ~ 2% TOTAL interrupts.RES
> > 20 ~ 0% -8.0% 18 ~ 2% TOTAL time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
> > 3430189 ~ 0% -5.9% 3226430 ~ 0% TOTAL time.voluntary_context_switches
> > 117 ~ 0% -6.0% 110 ~ 0% TOTAL time.system_time
> > 11691 ~ 0% -5.6% 11042 ~ 0% TOTAL vmstat.system.cs
> > 711 ~ 0% +4.4% 742 ~ 0% TOTAL iostat.sda.await
> > 712 ~ 0% +4.4% 743 ~ 0% TOTAL iostat.sda.w_await
> > 99142 ~ 0% -2.2% 96963 ~ 0% TOTAL iostat.sda.wkB/s
> > 99257 ~ 0% -2.2% 97110 ~ 0% TOTAL vmstat.io.bo
> > 139 ~ 0% +1.7% 141 ~ 0% TOTAL iostat.sda.avgqu-sz
> >
> >
The below graph shows all samples collected during the bisect
[*] bisect-good
[O] bisect-bad
In which you can see the stableness of the change and bisect.
> > fileio.requests_per_sec
> >
> > 6300 ++----------------------------------------------------------*-------+
> > 6250 *+.*.. .*.*..*..*..*..*..*.*..*..*..*..*..*.*..*..*..*..*. *..*..*
> > | *. |
> > 6200 ++ |
> > 6150 ++ |
> > | |
> > 6100 ++ |
> > 6050 ++ |
> > 6000 ++ O |
> > | O O |
> > 5950 O+ O O |
> > 5900 ++ O O O O O |
> > | O O O O O O |
> > 5850 ++ O O O |
> > 5800 ++------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >
> >
> > fileio.request_latency_max_ms
> >
> > 4500 ++------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > | * |
> > 4000 ++ : |
> > 3500 ++ :: |
> > | : : |
> > 3000 ++ * : : |
> > 2500 ++ *.. + : * : : |
> > | + + : + : : : |
> > 2000 ++ .*.. + * : + : : : |
> > 1500 ++ * *.. *.. .* * : .*..*..*..*..: : .*
> > *.. .. .. .* *. : *. |
> > 1000 ++ .* * *. * |
> > 500 ++ *. O |
> > O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O |
> > 0 ++------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists