[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1393982366.13402.0.camel@concordia>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 12:19:26 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux PPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, scottwood@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] perf: provide a common perf_event_nop_0() for
use with .event_idx
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 23:01 -0800, Cody P Schafer wrote:
> On 03/03/2014 09:19 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-27-02 at 21:04:56 UTC, Cody P Schafer wrote:
> >> Rather an having every pmu that needs a function that just returns 0 for
> >> .event_idx define their own copy, reuse the one in kernel/events/core.c.
> >>
> >> Rename from perf_swevent_event_idx() because we're no longer using it
> >> for just software events. Naming is based on the perf_pmu_nop_*()
> >> functions.
> >
> > You could just use perf_pmu_nop_int() directly.
>
> No, .event_idx needs something that takes a (struct perf_event *),
> perf_pmu_nop_int() takes a (struct pmu *).
Yeah, duh.
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists