[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZOPZ+xKFwjrpWnBQDU=CU2XbjP00Qfgj8AYJ1SGHhf8U9O-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 21:46:26 +0200
From: Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>, Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>,
Eli Cohen <eli@....mellanox.co.il>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Eugenia Emantayev <eugenia@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx4: Use GFP_NOFS calls during the ipoib TX path when
creating the QP
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:
> The problem encountered was described as follows:
> It's not memory reclamation that is the problem as such. There is
> an indirect dependency between network filesystems writing back
> pages and ipoib_cm_tx_init() due to how a kworker is used. Page
> reclaim cannot make forward progress until ipoib_cm_tx_init()
> succeeds and it is stuck in page reclaim itself waiting for network
> transmission. Ordinarily this sitaution may be avoided by having
> the caller use GFP_NOFS but ipoib_cm_tx_init() does not have
> that information.
So to hit the bug, one just needs to attempt doing NFS client mount
over an IP subnet served by IPoIB NIC that uses connected-mode and
runs over mlx4 device? Or this happens when the connection is going
through teardown/re-establishment or something else?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists