[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140306000058.GE18529@joshc.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 18:00:58 -0600
From: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] documentation: bindings: document PMIC8921/8058 RTC
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 12:58:55PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/05/14 11:29, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom,pm8xxx-rtc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom,pm8xxx-rtc.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..699bd30
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom,pm8xxx-rtc.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> > +* Real-Time Clock for Qualcomm 8058/8921 PMICs
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: should be one of the following.
> > + * "qcom,pm8058-rtc"
> > + * "qcom,pm8921-rtc"
> > +- reg: base address of the register region
> > +- reg-names: corresponding reg names for the regions listed in the 'reg'
> > + property, must contain:
> > + "rtc_base" - base of the RTC register region
>
> optional reg-names?
>
> > +- interrupts: interrupt list for the RTC, must contain a single interrupt
> > + specifier for the alarm interrupt
> > +- interrupt-names: corresponding interrupt names for the interrupts listed in
> > + the 'interrupts' property, must contain:
> > + "alarm" - summary interrupt for PMIC peripherals
>
> optional interrupt-names?
It isn't clear to me why these should be made optional, I hope Rob
provides some clarification in the sdhci-msm thread.
> > +
> > +Option properties:
Woops, this should be "Optional" :).
> > +- linux,allow-set-time: indicates that the setting of RTC time is allowed by
> > + the host CPU
>
> Is this a "linux" property? It seems like something that other OSes
> would want to know about and doesn't require any explicit knowledge
> about operating system things (like keymaps for example).
Yeah, I wasn't quite sure how to name this property. It's
Linux-specific in the sense that the underlying operation method is
"set_time", but I agree this should be named something else...
How do you feel about simply "allow-set-time"?
>
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +
> > + rtc {
>
> rtc@11d
Yep, thanks.
> > + compatible = "qcom,pm8921-rtc";
> > + reg = <0x11D>;
> > + reg-names = "rtc_base";
> > + interrupts = <0x27 0>;
> > + interrupt-names = "alarm";
> > + };
> >
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists