lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:58:48 +0800 From: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "alan@...ux.intel.com" <alan@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: new Intel Atom SoC power management controller driver On 2014/3/6 13:52, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 03/05/2014 09:33 PM, Li, Aubrey wrote: >> >> These interfaces are uncommitted and don't have consumers now, I'd like >> to keep them unstable in debugfs. >> >> We can change it if we received a requirement to use them later. >> > > What we absolutely don't want to happen is someone starting to use these > unstable interfaces for something other than debugging. If debugfs ever > needs to be mounted in a system for full functionality, that is a bug. > Understood. But we don't have a plan to use it now. Just for observation and diagnosis purpose only. Are you suggesting we should put them into sysfs now? Thanks, -Aubrey > -hpa > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists