linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: new Intel Atom SoC power management controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:58:48 +0800
From:	"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"alan@...ux.intel.com" <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: new Intel Atom SoC power management controller driver

On 2014/3/6 13:52, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 03/05/2014 09:33 PM, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>>
>> These interfaces are uncommitted and don't have consumers now, I'd like
>> to keep them unstable in debugfs.
>>
>> We can change it if we received a requirement to use them later.
>>
> 
> What we absolutely don't want to happen is someone starting to use these
> unstable interfaces for something other than debugging.  If debugfs ever
> needs to be mounted in a system for full functionality, that is a bug.
> 

Understood. But we don't have a plan to use it now. Just for observation
and diagnosis purpose only.

Are you suggesting we should put them into sysfs now?

Thanks,
-Aubrey

> 	-hpa
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/