lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 10:20:23 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> To: Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: Fix __addr_ok and __range_ok macros On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 05:41:28PM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote: > Without this, the following scenario is incorrectly determined > to be invalid. > > addr 0x7f_ffffe000 size 8192 addr_limit 0x80_00000000 > > This behavior was observed while trying to vmsplice the stack > as part of a CRIU dump of a process. > > Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org> > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h > index edb3d5c..9309024 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h > @@ -66,12 +66,12 @@ static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs) > #define segment_eq(a,b) ((a) == (b)) > > /* > - * Return 1 if addr < current->addr_limit, 0 otherwise. > + * Return 1 if addr <= current->addr_limit, 0 otherwise. > */ > #define __addr_ok(addr) \ > ({ \ > unsigned long flag; \ > - asm("cmp %1, %0; cset %0, lo" \ > + asm("cmp %1, %0; cset %0, ls" \ > : "=&r" (flag) \ > : "r" (addr), "0" (current_thread_info()->addr_limit) \ > : "cc"); \ BTW can this use mov %0, #0 like arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h does? Would make it more portable ... > @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs) > * Returns 1 if the range is valid, 0 otherwise. > * > * This is equivalent to the following test: > - * (u65)addr + (u65)size < (u65)current->addr_limit > + * (u65)addr + (u65)size <= current->addr_limit > * > * This needs 65-bit arithmetic. > */ > @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs) > ({ \ > unsigned long flag, roksum; \ > __chk_user_ptr(addr); \ > - asm("adds %1, %1, %3; ccmp %1, %4, #2, cc; cset %0, cc" \ > + asm("adds %1, %1, %3; ccmp %1, %4, #3, cc; cset %0, ls" \ > : "=&r" (flag), "=&r" (roksum) \ > : "1" (addr), "Ir" (size), \ > "r" (current_thread_info()->addr_limit) \ > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, > hosted by the Linux Foundation. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists