[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <531837A6.8090406@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:53:58 +0100
From: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
CC: <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Hante Meuleman" <meuleman@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the wireless-next tree
On 03/06/2014 03:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build
> (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_sdio.c: In function
> 'brcmf_sdio_intr_rstatus':
> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_sdio.c:2464:3: error:
> implicit declaration of function 'atomic_set_mask'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> Caused by commit c98db0bec72a ("brcmfmac: Use atomic functions for
> intstatus update"). Arm does not seem to provide
> atomic_set_mask()?
>
> I reverted that commit for today.
That is fine. The kbuild robot also found issue with this function on
other archs. I must say I am surprised as this code fragment in
asm-generic/atomic.h suggests it is needed for SMP to work (?):
20 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
21 /* Force people to define core atomics */
22 # if !defined(atomic_add_return) || !defined(atomic_sub_return) || \
23 !defined(atomic_clear_mask) || !defined(atomic_set_mask)
24 # error "SMP requires a little arch-specific magic"
25 # endif
26 #endif
Maybe this requirement is no longer valid. Anyway. I will sent revert
patch and replacement to John.
Thanks,
Arend
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists