[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140306091102.GG9987@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 10:11:02 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tony Lu <zlu@...era.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] tile: Add support for handling PMC hardware
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 06:13:48AM +0000, Tony Lu wrote:
The changelogs are all very sparse. But in general the stuff looks to
have the right shape.
It looks like you do software NMIs with interrupt priority levels; which
is a perfectly fine way, other archs do the same.
One thing I didn't spot is a tile irq_work implementation; perf likes to
have one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists