lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140306124622.16645.88666.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 06 Mar 2014 12:46:22 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, tim@...ctronghost.co.uk,
	linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] af_rxrpc: Remove incorrect checksum calculation from
 rxrpc_recvmsg() [ver #2]

From: Tim Smith <tim@...ctronghost.co.uk>

The UDP checksum was already verified in rxrpc_data_ready() - which calls
skb_checksum_complete() - as the RxRPC packet header contains no checksum of
its own.  Subsequent calls to skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec() are thus
redundant and are, in any case, being passed only a subset of the UDP payload -
so the checksum will always fail if that path is taken.

So there is no need to check skb->ip_summed in rxrpc_recvmsg(), and no need for
the csum_copy_error: exit path.

Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tim@...ctronghost.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---

 net/rxrpc/ar-recvmsg.c |   25 +------------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-recvmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/ar-recvmsg.c
index 34b5490dde65..e9aaa65c0778 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/ar-recvmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-recvmsg.c
@@ -180,16 +180,7 @@ int rxrpc_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
 		if (copy > len - copied)
 			copy = len - copied;
 
-		if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY ||
-		    skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
-			ret = skb_copy_datagram_iovec(skb, offset,
-						      msg->msg_iov, copy);
-		} else {
-			ret = skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec(skb, offset,
-							       msg->msg_iov);
-			if (ret == -EINVAL)
-				goto csum_copy_error;
-		}
+		ret = skb_copy_datagram_iovec(skb, offset, msg->msg_iov, copy);
 
 		if (ret < 0)
 			goto copy_error;
@@ -348,20 +339,6 @@ copy_error:
 	_leave(" = %d", ret);
 	return ret;
 
-csum_copy_error:
-	_debug("csum error");
-	release_sock(&rx->sk);
-	if (continue_call)
-		rxrpc_put_call(continue_call);
-	rxrpc_kill_skb(skb);
-	if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
-		if (skb_dequeue(&rx->sk.sk_receive_queue) != skb)
-			BUG();
-	}
-	skb_kill_datagram(&rx->sk, skb, flags);
-	rxrpc_put_call(call);
-	return -EAGAIN;
-
 wait_interrupted:
 	ret = sock_intr_errno(timeo);
 wait_error:

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ