[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1394118975.19290.104.camel@tkhai>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 19:16:15 +0400
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip] [PATCH]sched/fair: Fix endless loop in idle_balance()
This patch must go on top of the series:
[tip 1/2] sched/fair: Push down check for high priority class task into idle_balance()
[tip 2/2] sched/core: Fix endless loop in pick_next_task()
Check for fair tasks number to decide, that we've pulled a task.
rq's nr_running may contain throttled RT tasks.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Peter, this finaly fixes problem with RT throttling.
Should I send all three patches as one series?
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 10db4a8..f1eedae 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6710,7 +6710,7 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
* While browsing the domains, we released the rq lock.
* A task could have be enqueued in the meantime
*/
- if (this_rq->nr_running && !pulled_task) {
+ if (this_rq->cfs.h_nr_running && !pulled_task) {
pulled_task = 1;
goto out;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists