lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 16:17:47 -0300 From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com> To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>, Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>, Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mvebu: add Device Tree for the Armada 385 RD board On Mar 06, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > Can't we fix this so the probe order doesn't affect the name? > > > > Is that sane? > > You are not supposed to trust the device name, since probing can > happen in parallel, on different buses. udev should have rules to name > the interfaces based on the MAC address. On my Debian system i have: > > /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules > > So what is important is that the MAC addresses are assigned correctly > to the device. And DT does that based on MMIO address, so should be > reliable, independent of probe order. > Right, makes perfect sense! So we can just keep the nodes address-ordered, without caring about the name? -- Ezequiel GarcĂa, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists