[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140306210427.GH14033@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 16:04:27 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>,
Tim Hockin <thockin@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 04/11] mm, memcg: add tunable for oom reserves
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:59:19PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> Userspace needs a way to define the amount of memory reserves that
> processes handling oom conditions may utilize. This patch adds a per-
> memcg oom reserve field and file, memory.oom_reserve_in_bytes, to
> manipulate its value.
>
> If currently utilized memory reserves are attempted to be reduced by
> writing a smaller value to memory.oom_reserve_in_bytes, it will fail with
> -EBUSY until some memory is uncharged.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
We're completely unsure this is the way we wanna be headed and this is
a huge commitment. For now at least,
Nacked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists